This is a companion topic for our recent blog post on blog.unmanned.tech
RunCam’s WiFiLink hardware has made quite the splash in the world of open-source digital FPV, but the new Ruby FPV software still has a few kinks to iron out. Mads Tech’s review reveals that while setting up Ruby is child’s play compared to its predecessor OpenIPC, video delivery remains more jittery than your average cup of over-brewed tea.
The user interface is as polished as a British butler, making configuration a doddle. However, during flight tests, the promised smooth sailing turned into a rather bumpy ride, with noticeable jerkiness and latency issues that leave you feeling like you’re piloting an awkwardly dancing octopus rather than a finely-tuned aircraft. Despite these hiccups, it’s a step up from OpenIPC, if we’re being generous.
In tests, Ruby FPV faced off against various hardware setups and even some other systems like Edge T3. Spoiler alert: the latter emerged victorious, delivering a smoother and more immersive experience. It appears the problem lies not just with the software but possibly a deeper integration issue with the RunCam hardware itself.
In short, while Ruby FPV may be a decent starting point for those new to the FPV scene, it’s not quite ready for those who fancy themselves as the next aerial Picasso. Performance improvements are needed before it can confidently take on the freestyle crowd.
For further insights, check out the video here:
Read the full post over at: